Skip to content
Feature

Program Reviews and Ownership: Keep governance, review schedules, and ownership visible before the program drifts.

Program Lifecycle keeps recurring governance work, compliance calendar tasks, and review ownership on rails. Aurora shows what is due, overdue, and unowned so the program stays current between audits instead of slipping quietly.

Keep governance, review schedules, and ownership visible before the program drifts.
Sample output
Lifecycle calendar export
Answers with linked evidence

How It Works

Program Reviews And Ownership

Program Lifecycle keeps recurring governance work, compliance calendar tasks, and review ownership on rails. Aurora shows what is due, overdue, and unowned so the program stays current between audits instead of slipping quietly.

01
Owner assignment and schedule tracking across
Owner assignment and schedule tracking across governance artifacts
02
Overdue visibility that keeps programs from
Overdue visibility that keeps programs from drifting
03
Exportable schedule reports for audits
Exportable schedule reports for audits, buyer reviews, and renewals

Verified Before Review

Key Capabilities

The views, checks, and handoffs teams rely on when this workflow needs to stand up in review.

Feature 1 of 5: Designed for
Product capabilities
1/5

Designed for

SOC 2 • CMMC

What You Can Show Reviewers
Artifacts reviewers recognize, plus sample previews of structure.
Scroll for artifact previews
Plans
Plan availability
CoreProfessionalProfessional PlusEnterpriseEnterprise Plus

Integrations

Works With The Systems Already In Scope

Connect the systems that supply evidence, approvals, telemetry, and tickets so evidence stays current between review cycles.

Common Questions

Questions Teams Ask

Deployment scope, ownership, reviewer access, and how this capability fits the rest of your program.

How do policies, controls, and approvals stay tied together?
Aurora keeps version history, ownership, approvals, and related evidence attached so the governance record is easier to defend later.
What does the team actually share from this work?
Teams usually share Lifecycle calendar export; Overdue review report; Owner assignment history. The goal is to give reviewers the right package without making them reconstruct how the program operates.
Where does this help most in recurring audits?
It fits best when the team is handling SOC 2, CMMC and needs the work to stay reusable instead of being rebuilt each cycle.
What changes after rollout?
Keep the program current between audits and renewals Make ownership and due dates explicit
Live walkthrough
Share The Framework, Control Set, Or Policy Review You Keep Rebuilding.
We’ll show how Aurora keeps approvals, change history, and evidence connected so the next review starts from current work.
Share one request and we will show the path to lifecycle calendar export without losing approvals, ownership, or reviewer context.